Saturday, December 4, 2010

Millions Bracing for Cutoff of Unemployment Checks

December 3, 2010

Millions Bracing for Cutoff of Unemployment Checks

More than two million jobless Americans are entering the holiday season seized with varying levels of foreboding, worry or even panic over what lies ahead as they cope with the expected cutoff of their unemployment benefits.
Their economic fates are now connected on a taut string to skirmishing between Democrats and Republicans in Washington over whether to extend federal financing for unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless.
Tuesday marked the expiration of a pair of federal programs that had extended unemployment benefits anywhere from 34 to 73 weeks on top of the 26 weeks already provided by the states.
The federal extensions have been customary in past recessions and their aftermath, but they have become ensnared lately in political jousting over the soaring budget deficit.
Some recipients have already received their final checks. If the impasse remains unresolved, others will see their payments lapse in the coming days or weeks, depending on how long they have been receiving benefits.
By the end of December, more than two million are set to lose their extended benefits, according to estimates by the National Employment Law Project, and about a million more by the end of January.
While benefits have lapsed twice before in this downturn because of Congressional bickering — the last time, in June and July, payments were interrupted for 51 days— advocates for the unemployed are worried that if the issue is not resolved by the current lame-duck session of Congress, prospects in the next, with Republicans ascendant, are even slimmer.
That would mean a new reality facing legions of people across the country: a cutoff after six months of benefits for anyone out of work.
MICHAEL LUO


In Washington, Partisan Gridlock
WASHINGTON — With jobless benefits starting to run out for up two million of the long-term unemployed, Senate Democrats this week repeatedly tried to bring up a bill that would prolong aid for a year, only to hear Republicans object and block the legislation. Democrats, in turn, rejected Republican counterproposals.
In both the Senate and House, Democrats are pressing the case for jobless aid on two fronts, arguing that it is both the moral and humanitarian thing to do — especially during the holiday season — and that it is also an effective policy mechanism to help stimulate the economy.
“Unemployment insurance, the economists tell us, returns $2 for every dollar that is put out there,” the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, said in a floor speech on Thursday. “People need the money. They spend it immediately for necessities. It injects demand into the economy. It helps reduce the deficit.”
Republicans said they would be willing to extend benefits provided that Democrats agree to cut spending elsewhere to cover the cost, sparking indignation among Democrats who noted that the Republicans never insist on offsetting the revenue lost through tax cuts.
A deal to extend the aid is likely, but only as part of a wider agreement on the expiring Bush-era tax cuts, and it is unclear how long that will take.
One exchange on the Senate floor, between Senators Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island, and Scott P. Brown, Republican of Massachusetts, was emblematic of the debate.
“In my state of Rhode Island, people are in a very serious situation,” Mr. Reed said. “They are struggling to stay in their homes, to educate their children, to deal with the challenges of everyday life. They have worked hard and long all their lives, and now they are finding it difficult to get a job.”
Mr. Reed noted that Congress has always extended jobless benefits in times of high unemployment.
“We have always done it on an emergency basis because it truly is an emergency,” he said. “We have always determined that it was necessary to get the money to the people who could use it, who needed it desperately, and we should do that again.”
Moments later, when Mr. Reed asked for the Senate’s unanimous agreement to consider his bill, Mr. Brown was waiting. “I object,” Mr. Brown said. “And I have a pay-for alternative on which I would like to speak.”
Mr. Brown proposed that money previously appropriated but not yet spent be redirected for the jobless aid. “The recent job numbers in Massachusetts reflect over 280,000 people unemployed in my state alone — over 8 percent of the Massachusetts work force. As the senator from Rhode Island mentioned — and I know Rhode Island well; I eat in Federal Hill regularly — the unemployment is much higher there.”
Mr. Brown noted that within just six and a half hours benefits would start to run out. “I don’t want this to happen,” he said. “If we fail to act today, 60,000 Bay Staters will see their unemployment checks evaporate at the end of the week.”
Mr. Brown then asked unanimous consent for the Senate to take up his proposal. Mr. Reed, however, was waiting. “I object,” he said.
DAVID HERSZENHORN
 
Lessons in Making Do With Less and Less
ORLANDO, Fla. — People used to living on little learn a lot of tricks to get by.
How long to ignore the notices before the power really gets shut off, for example. Or how many days past the freshness date stamped on a package of bologna is one day too many.
But the people walking into the Community Food and Outreach Center here have often run out of options. And now they may soon have to learn to be even poorer.
It is the responsibility of the center’s staff to try to help them deal with this new level of doing without.
“We already turn off the AC and pretty much eat those dollar noodles with the seasoning packet,” said Jacynth Allen, who at 47 finds herself for the first time among the long-term unemployed.
Workers here are preparing to increase by about 30 percent the amount of food they have available, just one example of preparations occurring across the country as social service providers brace for what they expect to be a surge of people in need.
With the memory of the onslaught that occurred when unemployment benefits lapsed over the summer, the center is planning one of its most aggressive food drives ever, along with a campaign to drum up donations and volunteers, said Andrae Bailey, the executive director.
The organization is also planning to invite governmental agencies and other nonprofits to set up on campus to offer assistance.
“These families don’t know how to navigate through an economic crisis,” he said. “Their support system is already depleted. They have nothing left to sell and no one left to ask. And now they are going to lose the $250 they use for housing and food.”
It is among the center’s aisles of free bread and deeply discounted packaged food that the simple daily challenge of being newly poor shows itself. Trying to put together a meal when even a dime makes a difference is bewildering for someone who used to stroll down the aisle at the grocery store with only a casual interest in coupons.
How do you plan a menu around a random collection that might include a tube of anchovy paste, a can of mandarin orange slices and a slightly crushed box of Ritz crackers?
The relative value of the little things a household takes for granted — plastic garbage bags, toothpaste — must be weighed against an extra box of cereal or a package of off-brand cookies that might soften the situation, if only for a few bites.
Troy O’Dell, 42, rejected a dented family-size can of tomato soup the food bank had marked at $1.29. He knew he could get it at a grocery outlet for 89 cents.
Mr. O’Dell resents having to even think about the price of a can of soup. He’s a dry waller who was never out of work until a couple of years ago. He figures he has one unemployment check left.
He says he will have to get even smarter about stretching his food bank supplies to feed him and his 14-year-old daughter.
The deer he shot a few days ago will help. With his last unemployment check, he plans to buy an $8 seasoning packet so he can make 40 pounds of venison jerky.
“That way, it’ll last longer,” he said.
KIM SEVERSON
 
Mounting Bills And Pessimism
FAIRBURN, Ga. — Frank Sanders can visualize how his tidy, green-shuttered mobile home will deteriorate if he does not regain unemployment benefits.
His living room furniture? It is scheduled to be repossessed. The kitchen? He is already stockpiling canned food donated by churches. The mobile home itself? By next month, he will have spent his last rent money, and then Mr. Sanders, a 64-year-old Vietnam veteran who lost his job as a welder last year, is bracing for the possibility of homelessness.
“We’re running low on time,” said Mr. Sanders, a bulky former Air Force parachutist who lives with his disabled wife, Ruth, in this small Atlanta suburb. Their monthly income of $948 in Social Security benefits does not cover her medical expenses, let alone their car, phone, rent, food or electrical costs, he said. “The bills just keep piling up.”
Add to that grim outlook a new concern: This week is the first since Mr. Sanders lost his job in May 2009 that they will not receive $323 in government unemployment benefits. Unless Congress approves a measure extending federal assistance for the long-term unemployed, they will be among more than two million jobless Americans who will lose their benefits by the end of this month. So there is a special urgency to Mr. Sanders’s daily trips around town in his Chevy Trailblazer, applying for jobs at fast-food restaurants, construction sites and retail stores. An artist by hobby, he also paints landscapes on common items — milk jugs, vinyl records, buzz saws — and sells them for $15.
Such hardship is humbling. Raised in a working-class family and employed all of his life until last year, Mr. Sanders went to a food bank for a donated Thanksgiving turkey. “I’m supposed to be the provider, I’m supposed to be taking care of the situation,” he said. “There I am begging for food.”
He lost his job at a factory that welds equipment for bulldozers in Lafayette, Ind., amid a companywide downsizing. His wife’s daughter lives in Georgia, so they moved here this year, hoping he could find work as a carpenter or construction worker, but so far he has not received any offers. For “good luck,” he recently placed a large golden Buddha statue in his living room. But he admits that he is pessimistic. The state unemployment rate is 10 percent. Every evening, he watches C-Span, hoping for news that Congress has passed the extensions, and ends up yelling at the television.
“I’m wondering where the next dollar is going to come from, or the next meal,” he said. “When I’m not looking for work, my day is filled with a lot of pacing back and forth.”
ROBBIE BROWN

Friday, December 3, 2010

Viacom Set to Appeal in YouTube Case

Viacom Set to Appeal in YouTube Case

Viacom Inc. says a new wave of digital piracy could threaten the U.S. media business unless federal courts overturn its defeat in a copyright-infringement lawsuit against Google Inc.'s YouTube video-sharing site.
The New York-based owner of MTV, Comedy Central and Paramount Pictures is expected as early as Friday to file its appeal of the June decision with the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. To add firepower to its case, Viacom has brought in former U.S. Solicitor General Theodore Olson to argue.
Associated Press
Viacom, which owns Comedy Central and other channels, claims Google sought to exploit its copyrighted works, such as 'The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.'
Dating from the dawn of the Web-video era, the case has divided many in the media and technology worlds. It centers in part on how aggressively YouTube—and by extension video-sharing sites like it—must police what users upload to its servers in order to avoid being liable for any unauthorized clips.
In June, a federal judge in Manhattan ruled strongly in favor of Google's motion for summary judgment, saying YouTube is protected from copyright claims by "safe harbor" provisions in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The 1998 law shields some types of online entities from liability if they meet certain conditions, such as removing content at the request of the copyright holder. "General knowledge that infringement is 'ubiquitious' does not impose a duty on the service provider to monitor or search its service for infringements," the judge wrote.
Viacom, for its part, has claimed that YouTube had intentionally sought to exploit tens of thousands of Viacom's copyrighted works, such as clips of "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart," and doesn't qualify for those protections. "It is extremely destructive if the precedent is set in the wrong way," Mr. Olson said in an interview.
[VIAGOOG]
A Google spokeswoman said in a statement: "We regret that Viacom continues to drag out this case. The court here, like every other court to have considered the issue, correctly ruled that the law protects online services like YouTube, which remove content when notified by the copyright holder that it is unauthorized. We will strongly defend the court's decision on appeal." She declined to comment further.
Some legal observers have argued that the case has become less significant since it was filed in early 2007. Since then, YouTube, interested in licensing professional content, has voluntarily started using audio and video recognition technology to automatically identify unauthorized clips as they are uploaded and let rights-holders take them down immediately or place ads in the videos to generate revenue. Those systems work well, executives at several media companies have said, and Viacom isn't suing YouTube for its behavior after mid-2008.
On Thursday, Google announced changes to its copyright rules, saying that over the next several months it will be able to respond to requests to take down copyrighted material on YouTube and other Google sites in 24 hours or less.
In a post on the company's blog, Kent Walker, Google's general counsel, also said the company will do a better job of restricting copyright violators on the Web from participating in Google's advertising network, known as AdSense.
Both the Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America, two media trade groups, issued statements lauding the moves as positive "first steps."
"The state of the art has just moved on in the last four years," said Eric Goldman, associate professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, who believes that Google has the better case. "We know how the story turned out; everyone won."
Viacom argues, however, that establishing underlying legal precedents in its favor has become more crucial, as the Internet becomes a bigger vehicle for commerce. Broadband speeds are faster, and media companies are increasingly looking to the online distribution of video as a future of the business, its executives say.
"It's as if to say, well we've stopped robbing banks, so let's just forget the whole thing and move on," Mr. Olson said. "It is exceedingly important in this era of intellectual property and new creative endeavors that we continue to respect what people create," he added.
Mr. Olson, who was an assistant attorney general in the Reagan administration, has a long history with high-profile federal cases. He represented Citizens United in its successful challenge of campaign finance laws, and is now on the team challenging California's Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage. A federal appeals court in San Francisco is slated to hear arguments in that case Monday.
Some intellectual-property lawyers say Viacom's appeal could focus in part on how specifically aware of copyright violations YouTube must have been to be denied protection under the 1998 law.
In the June decision, the judge said that a jury could find YouTube "welcomed" copyright infringing material, but that "general" awareness of infringement wasn't the same as specific knowledge, and that YouTube removed videos when asked.
Andrew Berger, counsel at Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt LLP, who isn't involved in the case but supports Viacom's position, says one could argue less specific knowledge should qualify. "When you welcome a thief in your house, you probably know he's there," he said.
Some major technology companies have supported Google, while other media companies have backed Viacom.]
Rick Cotton, general counsel for General Electric Co.'s NBC Universal, said precedents around online video are important. "You want new, legitimate access points to evolve, and those new and innovative services are likely to be killed in the crib by theft if the Internet is simply awash with stolen content," he said.


Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703741004575651041817080912.html#ixzz174qknjHQ

Buffalo, NY - Stranded motorists vent on the radio

Stranded motorists vent on the radio

Updated: Thursday, 02 Dec 2010, 6:52 PM EST
Published : Thursday, 02 Dec 2010, 6:07 PM EST
http://www.wivb.com/dpp/weather/winter_weather/Stranded-motorists-vent-on-the-radio
BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) - WBEN Radio took calls all morning from frustrated motorists who were stuck on the thruway with nowhere to go.
There's a real sense of outrage among motorists who were trapped on the thruway in their cars. It's hard for many of us to imagine what it's like to be stuck for more than 12 hours. Stranded motorist were beyond the frustration point, and were worried about not getting "the basics."
Will said, "If the State Police and the Thruway Authority can't handle this, call in the National Guard. We're going on 13 hours out here with no food, no water, no lavatory facilities. It's like a third world country."
Elizabeth got on the thruway at 7:15 Wednesday night, about 15 hours before she called from Blasdell.
"I'm a little frustrated because I'm only 24-years-old and I had the foresight when I heard a storm coming to put a snow brush, a blanket, and a shovel in my car, so why didn't this New York State Authority with all of these people who lived through the Blizzard of '77 have the foresight: "Hey maybe we need some extra shovels." Right now they are just digging out one car at a time. We've got a thousand people stranded here. I say why not 500 of us, why not give us 500 shovels. We can just work our way back," said Elizabeth.
She said people who got out of their cars to try and help others were ordered back into their cars. Officials were more concerned that stranded cars could tie up the situation even worse.
A major complaint from drivers seemed to question what appeared be a lack of official direction in the crisis. They are hoping something will be done to prevent this kind of crisis from happening again.
**********************************************************************

Depew buried and under driving ban

Updated: Thursday, 02 Dec 2010, 7:08 PM EST
Published : Thursday, 02 Dec 2010, 7:08 PM EST
DEPEW, N.Y. (WIVB) - In the suburbs, Depew was one of the hardest hit areas, where a driving ban is in effect until 6 a.m. on Friday tomorrow. But some areas saw barely any snow.
It's hard to believe, but there is snow up to your waist and snow banks piled high enough to bury cars and trucks. The village of Depew was buried under close to three feet of snow, leaving folks wondering if it was ever going to stop.
Mike Bleasdale said, "We go out, get it clean, go in and get something to eat. Come back out, put the stuff in the driveway, come back out. That's all you can do!"
After the state thruway was shut down, traffic was diverted onto Depew's main thoroughfares, leading to gridlock. And as drivers took side streets, to avoid those backups, they got stuck.
With crews pre-occupied keeping the main thoroughfares, such as Broadway in Depew, open, many of the side streets, such as Keefer, were virtually untouched. Not only that, there is a four-foot barrier of snow piled up that is blocking the street. Depew officials were overwhelmed.
Director of Emergency Management Mike Moskal said, "We have declared a Limited State of Emergency so that we can utilize our public works mutual aid plan. We've reached out to some of the towns in the northtowns to try and give us a hand."
Later in the morning, Amherst sent three town snowplow crews, two frontloaders, and contractors to help Depew dig itself out. Abandoned vehicles were towed to open up side streets that were virtually impassable.
Depew Police Capt. Stan Carwile said, "They are not parking right up to the curbs, and you might have two cars parked on ech side of the road, so now the plow cannot pass through that particular road."
A semi-tractor came all the way from New Jersey, but the snow kept driver Jaime Restrepo from delivering the goods until Friday.
Restrepo said, "They said no way to get in there. They don't know if tomorrow they can take me. So I have to stay overnight around here."
A few minutes later, a tow truck showed up and got Restrepo on his way. The snow did take its toll on some of Depew's snow removal equipment, with a couple of trucks getting knocked out of service. Again, the driving ban remains in effect until 6:00 Friday morning.
Copyright WIVB.com
*****************************************************************************

CBS Evening News covers thruway snafu

Updated: Friday, 03 Dec 2010, 1:46 AM EST
Published : Thursday, 02 Dec 2010, 11:03 PM EST
WEST SENECA, N.Y. (WIVB) - The snowbound snafu on the state thruway drew the attention of national media Thursday night.
CBS News correspondent Elaine Quijano reported from West Seneca on the CBS Evening News Thursday night.
Quijano said, "To me, what's so unusual about this, everyone knows that people in Buffalo can handle snow. So when you hear about people trapped in their cars on an interstate, the big question is: how did this happen? And I think for a national audience that really is the question here, is how did it get to be that so many cars kept piling up behind after this accident happened? Why wasn't the thruway shut down and no other cars allowed to enter, because we all know lake effect snow can roll in very quickly as happened here, two feet of snow, I hear."
The Weather Channel also reported from WNY Thursday night.
*****************************************************************************
A western New York highway that was closed for over 24 hours because of an accident that left trucks and cars stranded in heavy snow was reopened Friday morning, state police said.
A Lake Erie-fed storm that began Wednesday and continued through Thursday buried parts of Buffalo and some suburbs under more than two feet of snow.
Downtown Buffalo was largely spared, but dozens of schools canceled classes and more were scheduled to be closed on Friday.
Police closed Interstate 90 about 3 a.m. ET Thursday after a truck jackknifed the previous evening and vehicles became backed up and buried in blowing snow, State Trooper Daniel Golinski said.
Drivers also were stranded on a 3-mile stretch of Interstate 190.
Golinski described the scene overnight as "13 miles of bumper-to-bumper cars, two lanes each — three lanes each depending on where they are."
Though parts of I-90, better known as the New York Thruway, were reopened by midday, an 11-mile stretch remained closed as darkness fell.
Traffic, mostly big rigs, was backed up for about 2 miles in the eastbound lanes and a mile headed west after sunset.
The rest of the highway was reopened at 6:15 a.m. ET on Friday.
The snowfall was expected to stop early Friday after leaving another 4 to 8 inches, which would total up to 32 inches for some communities.
'Stuff happens' Jack Geiselman, who was stranded for 14 hours in 32-degree weather, took it all in stride.
"I tend not to be a ranter-and-raver about things and the point is, it's nothing I have any control over," the 60-year-old semi-retired civil engineer said. "I guess the way I look at it is, it's over. I guess stuff happens. It's not the end of the world."
Geiselman was traveling in a Honda Civic from Keene, N.Y., to Cleveland with his black lab Boomer to help his daughter get her house ready for a baby due between Christmas and New Year.
He had with him a sleeping bag and plenty of warm clothing and gas. He said state troopers came by with coffee and food for people in cars.
Emergency crews on ATVs passed out water and protein bars, and buses picked up motorists and delivered them to a shelter at a senior citizen center.
State Police had no reports of medical emergencies, although one older motorist who uses oxygen was among the stranded and was taken to safety, said Capt. Michael Nigrelli.
Not to be discouraged, two truck drivers who left their tandems idling in the morning tramped through the snow for about half a mile to pick up a breakfast sandwich and coffee off the highway. They seemed almost cheerful despite the hit on their livelihood.
"The wheels are not moving and we're making nothing," said Don Lanphere, 51, a trucker for 32 years who was hauling dog food. "The only guys making money are the plow operators."
"I had the radio on listening," said Curt Doverspike, 40, a trucker from Jamestown. "They said we should be getting out soon. Nothing ever happened so we just went to bed, woke up this morning. We're just kind of used to it."
He said regular travelers were venting their frustrations but the truck drivers were calmer.
"There's traffic jams, accidents all the time," Doverspike said. "You just get used to it. I guess it's easier for us than those in the cars because they get frustrated. We have a bed. If we get bored, we lay down and go to bed."
In need of 'nice cup of a coffee' Nigrelli said the combination of fast-falling snow and the large number of commercial vehicles — many of which had to be towed out after the snow piled up around them — made re-opening the road slow-going.
"Unfortunately, that's not something that can be undone very quickly," he said.

Some truckers left the road to find refuge at truck stops, parking lots and city streets, but most kept their rigs parked on the highway, especially the tandem drivers.
Matt Welling was hauling a double tractor-trailer full of groceries when traffic came to a standstill.
He spent the night "sitting back, playing a little Solitaire on the computer, taking a nap," the Wegmans driver said after more than eight hours stuck on the road.
"I'm pretty chilly, hungry. A nice cup of coffee would do pretty well right now," he said by cell phone.
Driving restrictions were in place in southern Buffalo and suburban Cheektowaga, Depew, Lancaster and West Seneca, where bands of snow hung stubbornly overhead.
A snow warning was in effect until late Thursday night, with several more inches possible before the storm was expected to drift south, meteorologists said.
Additional snow was in Friday's forecast, though in lesser amounts.
In Cattaraugus County on New York's southwestern edge, flooding was the problem following heavy rain.
Two emergency shelters were opened, in Olean and Portville, as the Allegheny River reached moderate flood stage. Between 50 and 100 homes were affected, said Stephanie Timblin, spokeswoman for the county's Office of Emergency Services.
****************************************************************************

Snow mounds grow as frustration mounts

Updated: Saturday, 04 Dec 2010, 6:34 PM EST
Published : Saturday, 04 Dec 2010, 6:29 PM EST
SOUTH BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) - The big dig continues because some residents in South Buffalo and the southtowns are still snowed-in. Road crews are making significant progress, but many homeowners are still frustrated.
Dump trucks have been working all day on clearing out the snow, bringing in load after load only to come back with more. The Mayor of Buffalo tells News 4 that snow plows have now reached every street in South Buffalo and Lovejoy. People on Cable Street said it was the first time they'd seen a plow since Wednesday.
Martin Niwinski said, "I got out of work Wednesday and had to leave my car. I had to walk home until I dug it out."
Robert Manion has his work cut out for him. Even though the street has been plowed, he still has to remove the snow from his property. So he shovels it, puts it in a wheelbarrow, and makes his way to dump it at the end of his driveway.
"There's no other way because it's so tough down there so you can't use a snow blower. It's too compact, it's too wet, so the snow blower won't do anything," said Manion.
News 4 has received numerous complaints from residents in South Buffalo and Lackawanna. They say they're frustrated they had to wait so long for the snowplows. They're still showing patience. A few hours each day gives them some progress, but as they go back and forth on the street, residents have noticed another issue.
Niwinski said, "I just hope they don't leave it like this because I don't really feel like shoveling anymore."
"The plow comes down, piles it up, puts it right on the sidewalk," said Tom Linkowski.
Cable Street was one of the last streets to be cleared. We've been told no one else in South Buffalo should be buried underneath the snow. Mayor Brown is asking residents to begin shoveling sidewalks as snow removal continues. Garbage pick-up will still be on the Monday schedule and starting Monday, all 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. on street parking regulations will resume in Lovejoy and South Buffalo.
Copyright WIVB.com

No aid to help fix flood damage in Cortland County, NY

No aid to help fix flood damage in Cortland County


Updated: 12:03 am
Cortland (WSYR-TV) - Despite qualifying for assistance, Cortland County found out Thursday it won't be getting any federal or state funding to help pay for the cost of repairs to roads damaged in a late September flood. Not getting the financial help could have long-term impacts on the County.

The September 30, rainstorm brought the water down hard and fast, swelling some rivers and creeks beyond their capacity. Some roads were simply eaten away as the water made new paths for itself.

Although the damage was sufficient to qualify the County for federal aid, Highway Superintendent Don Chambers says it won't be coming because there weren't enough total counties impacted to draw the funding. He also says that while the damage was triple the amount required to qualify for state aid, the Governor has inexplicably refused to declare it a disaster area.

Instead, Chambers says, the cost of repairing the flood-damaged roads falls on the County and local municipalities. Paying for those repairs may mean delaying other road work, including the County's annual culvert replacement program. "That may have to be deferred and may require me to be more on an emergency-type mode, if this continues, which is not a cost effective way to manage your road system," he said.

Another heavy rain Wednesday further compromised some fragile roadways. Chambers says that a lack of aid could have long term impacts as his department works to repair the damage.

The Cortland County legislature has unanimously passed a resolution calling on the Governor to declare the county a disaster area. Chambers says they're still holding out hope of getting some aid from Albany.

"Our budgets at this point are very tight and its something that we don not need and can afford, our budgets are strained as they are and this just adds additional strain to our budget," said Chambers.
****************************
4 Comments


luceononuro - 12/2/2010 10:12 PM
Honestly, Mr. Chambers statement says it all: [the money] won't be coming because there weren't enough total counties impacted to draw the funding. He also says that while the damage was triple the amount required to qualify for state aid, the Governor has inexplicably refused to declare it a disaster area. HOW STUPID ARE ELECTED OFFICIALS? I swear, the minute they get elected, it's like 'check your intelligence in at the door'. Sure place the burden to repair the roads onto the local property taxpayer... use my other taxes to pay for things, like raises for those on welfare and HDTV's for prison inmates. Is it just me or should we still be talkin' about a revolution!

Observer7 - 12/2/2010 10:08 PM
mustangkid is right. Government is supposed to have responsibility to fix road, not the authority to take money from a citizen taxpayer and give it to a citizen leech.

themustangkid - 12/2/2010 10:01 PM
Perhaps if the county would stop being so quick to pay for "NEWLY IMPORTED FROM NEW YORK CITY WELFARE" the county could have the money. Cortland is the quickest to pay for new welfare...correction, SOCIAL SERVICES... If they had to be residents for say, nine months and have had a paying job in the county...even if lost, then they could pay. Not pay them in 6 weeks!

rocketman - 12/2/2010 9:51 PM
Patterson-return the congical visit trailor for 770K and you have the money

Fed aid in financial crisis went beyond U.S. banks to industry, foreign firms

Fed aid in financial crisis went beyond U.S. banks to industry, foreign firms
By Jia Lynn Yang, Neil Irwin and David S. Hilzenrath
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, December 2, 2010; 12:15 AM


The financial crisis stretched even farther across the economy than many had realized, as new disclosures show the Federal Reserve rushed trillions of dollars in emergency aid not just to Wall Street but also to motorcycle makers, telecom firms and foreign-owned banks in 2008 and 2009.
The Fed's efforts to prop up the financial sector reached across a broad spectrum of the economy, benefiting stalwarts of American industry including General Electric and Caterpillar and household-name companies such as Verizon, Harley-Davidson and Toyota. The central bank's aid programs also supported U.S. subsidiaries of banks based in East Asia, Europe and Canada while rescuing money-market mutual funds held by millions of Americans.
The biggest users of the Fed lending programs were some of the world's largest banks, including Citigroup, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Swiss-based UBS and Britain's Barclays, according to more than 21,000 loan records released Wednesday under new financial regulatory legislation.
The data reveal banks turning to the Fed for help almost daily in the fall of 2008 as the central bank lowered lending standards and extended relief to all kinds of institutions it had never assisted before.
Fed officials emphasize that their actions were meant to stabilize a financial system that was on the verge of collapse in late 2008. They note that the actions worked to prevent a complete financial meltdown and that none of the special lending programs has lost money. (Some have recorded healthy profits for taxpayers.)
But the extent of the lending to major banks - and the generous terms of some of those deals - heighten the political peril for a central bank that is already under the gun for a wide range of actions, including a recent decision to try to stimulate the economy by buying $600 billion in U.S. bonds.
"The American people are finally learning the incredible and jaw-dropping details of the Fed's multitrillion-dollar bailout of Wall Street and corporate America," said Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.), a longtime Fed critic whose provision in the Wall Street regulatory overhaul required the new disclosures. "Perhaps most surprising is the huge sum that went to bail out foreign private banks and corporations. As a result of this disclosure, other members of Congress and I will be taking a very extensive look at all aspects of how the Federal Reserve functions."
The Fed launched emergency programs totaling $3.3 trillion in aid, a figure reached by adding up the peak amount of lending in each program.
Companies that few people would associate with Wall Street benefited through the Fed's program to ease the market for commercial paper, a form of short-term debt used by major corporations to fund their daily activities.
By the fall of 2008, credit had frozen across the financial system, including the commercial paper market. The Fed then purchased commercial paper issued by GE 12 times for a total of $16 billion. It bought paper from Harley-Davidson 33 times, for a total of $2.3 billion. It picked up debt issued by Verizon twice, totaling $1.5 billion.
"It is hard to say what would have happened without the facility, and how its absence might have affected GE, but overall the program was extremely effective in helping stabilize the market," GE spokesman Russell Wilkerson said by e-mail.
Verizon spokesman Robert A. Varettoni said that it was "an extraordinary time," adding that there was no credit available otherwise at the time.
The data revealed that the Fed continued making purchases into the summer of 2009 - after the official end of the recession - showing that it was still concerned about a fundamental part of the financial system even as economic growth was returning.
The disclosure shows "how really profound the financial crisis was in the fall of 2008 and the firepower the Fed mustered in response," said analyst Karen Shaw Petrou of Federal Financial Analytics.
Foreign-owned banks also benefited from the Fed's commercial-paper facility. The Korean Development Bank, owned by the South Korean government, used the program to the tune of billions of dollars, including a $407 million short-term loan on a single day. Many foreign banks, including the French BNP Paribas, the Swiss UBS and the German Deutsche Bank, took extensive advantage of various programs. Even a major bank in Bavaria benefited, as well as another one headquartered in Bahrain, a tiny island country in the Middle East.
Another Fed program allowed investment banks for the first time to borrow directly from the Fed as officials sought to stem the panic that had taken down Wall Street titan Bear Stearns. The central bank assisted 18 companies through this program. Among the biggest beneficiaries was Citigroup, which in a single day in November 2008 borrowed $18.6 billion from the Fed.
The data also demonstrate how the Fed, in its scramble to keep the financial system afloat, eventually lowered its standards for the kind of collateral it allowed participating banks to post. From Citigroup, for instance, it accepted $156 million in triple-C collateral or lower - grades that indicate that the assets carried the greatest risk of default.
Dallas Federal Reserve President Richard Fisher defended the Fed's actions during the financial crisis, saying the central bank "stepped into the breach" in its role as a lender of last resort.
"That's what we are paid to do," he said. "We took an enormous amount of risk with the people's money," he acknowledged. But the crisis lending programs are now all closed, he said, "and we didn't lose a dime, and in fact we made money on every one of them."
The banks universally hailed the Fed on Wednesday.
"In late 2008, many of the US funding markets were clearly broken," Goldman Sachs said in a statement, echoing similar comments made by Bank of America and Citigroup. "The Federal Reserve took essential steps to fix these markets and its actions were very successful."
By 2009, Goldman and other Wall Street firms were reporting their best profits ever. That allowed these banks to pay out huge salaries again, but it also drew the ire of lawmakers and ordinary Americans.
Sanders, for one, said these banks got off easy while receiving extraordinary aid. In rescuing these firms, the Fed never required them to lend to small businesses, modify the mortgages of homeowners or invest in a way that would create jobs.
"We bailed these guys out, but the requirements placed upon them had very little positive impact on the needs of ordinary Americans," Sanders said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/01/AR2010120106870_Comments.html

Thursday, December 2, 2010

California - State budget reality check

Capitol Journal

State budget reality check

Tough talk
Gov.-elect Jerry Brown "wants to force the Legislature and the public to really confront how bad the situation is,” says spokesman Sterling Clifford. “... The plan is to produce a budget without smoke and mirrors.” (Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times / September 15, 2010)

Brown to get on soapbox about painful choices that lie ahead.


Jerry Brown has reached two conclusions as he meticulously examines the chronically ailing state budget that he's about to inherit.
One, it's every bit as sick as he feared, and the cure will be extremely painful.
Two, Californians are mostly in denial about the needed treatment, and the governor-elect must try to educate them.
There can be no permanent remedy until people understand the severity of the fiscal illness, Brown realizes. So he plans to soon jump on a soap box and shout the uncomfortable truth, probably beginning at a large Sacramento forum attended by legislators, interest groups and anyone else who cares.
"He wants to force the Legislature and the public to really confront how bad the situation is," says Brown spokesman Sterling Clifford. "But he won't be talking solutions yet."
As part of the education effort, Brown intends to demonstrate exactly what living within our means without a tax increase is all about. He'll do that when he sends the Legislature his first budget proposal in early January.
"The plan is to produce a budget without smoke and mirrors," Clifford says.
Without the usual masquerade of smoke and mirrors, the document will be too glaringly ugly for most people, based on polls.
Of those who voted in the Nov. 2 election, 65% believe that the state government "wastes a lot" of tax money, according to a survey reported Wednesday by the Public Policy Institute of California. Presumably they blame the old bugaboo "waste, fraud and abuse" for the perpetual deficit.
In a postelection Los Angeles Times/USC poll, 44% of voters thought spending cuts alone would be the best deficit cure. But 44% also supported a combination of spending cuts and tax increases.
The polled voters sent mixed signals to the incoming governor. Their top priority for him was to protect education and healthcare funding. Their next highest priority was to cut spending. And generally, they opposed cutting programs paid for by 85% of the deficit-ridden general fund.
No doubt another Brown agenda before he takes office — another reason for all the educating — is to remind everyone that he didn't create this mess. He's merely assuming the cleanup job.
Never mind, as I wrote Monday, that Sacramento's fiscal affliction began with the way Proposition 13 was implemented when Brown was governor 32 years ago. The state bailed out local governments and schools for their dramatic loss in property tax revenue, and they've been on the Sacramento dole ever since.
Roughly 70% of the state general fund flows out to schools and local governments, mainly counties, for services they primarily financed themselves before Prop. 13.
But Brown has had nothing to do with the state's fiscal irresponsibility of the last dozen years.
All the borrowing, accounting gimmicks, knowingly false assumptions, the total make-believe? Blame Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Legislature. And for the overspending and excessive tax-cutting? Blame former Gov. Gray Davis and that Legislature.
And, of course, there's the devastating recession.
This is the budget disorder that Brown faces, according to the nonpartisan legislative analyst: a $6.1-billion shortfall in the $92.5-billion general fund spending for the fiscal year that ends June 30. Then, if that red ink is swept into the next fiscal year, there'll be a total $25.4-billion deficit through mid-2012.
Basically there's a $20-billion annual "structural deficit" — that much more spending obligation than projected revenue — until at least mid-2016. Those are the legislative analyst's figures, but virtually no one disputes them.
To put that $20-billion ongoing deficit in perspective, consider these numbers gleaned variously from the state Finance Department and the legislative analyst for the next fiscal year:
*You could fire all state workers paid out of the general fund — except for university employees, who are not under the governor's control — and you'd save only $9.2billion. Freezing their pay would barely make a dent.
*Eliminate all funding for the University of California and Cal State University and you'd save only $5.4billion.
*Close down all the state prisons and you'd gain $9billion.
*End the state's main welfare program, Cal-Works, and save $3billion.
*Wipe out In-Home Supportive Services for the disabled trying to stay out of nursing homes: save $1.7billion.
*Drop out of federal Medicaid — in California called Medi-Cal — and save a bunch: $17.6billion. We'd be the only state to do that. Roughly 7.5million impoverished Californians use the program: welfare recipients, their children, the aged, disabled.
End Medi-Cal, and many poor people would fall into the counties' last-resort safty net called general assistance. And that would pile a bigger burden on counties.
Or, here are other options:
*Extend a temporary increase in the vehicle license fee, scheduled to expire July 1, and pick up $1.5billion.
*Extend a sales tax hike also scheduled to expire July 1, and pull in $4.6billion.
*Extend an income tax surcharge that will expire Jan. 1 and net $2billion.
But extending tax hikes temporarily wouldn't cure the structural deficit.
More spending cuts will be required. And the entire tax structure needs to be modernized to fit a 21st century economy. That includes extending the sales tax to services.
But Brown won't be talking much about taxes, at least until he slashes services and inflicts all the pain that voters consider tolerable.
The legislative analyst — and practically every other objective numbers-cruncher — long has regarded a combination of spending cuts and tax increases as the only permanent budget cure.
But Brown has pledged not to raise taxes unless voters approve. Before they do, they'll need a lot of his educating about reality.

Fears of Regression as Newark Police Force Is Cut

Fears of Regression as Newark Police Force Is Cut


Matt Rainey for The New York Times
Ramon Tabera, a grocery clerk in Newark who was shot during a robbery at work in 2005, questioned the city’s layoff of about 13 percent of its police force.

NEWARK — For Ramon Tabera, the news that this city was laying off 163 police officers brought back memories of the pain in his left knee and right ankle, where he was shot five years ago during a nighttime robbery at a grocery store where he works.
Matt Rainey for The New York Times
Kimble Wright, a teacher, second from left, said the layoffs were because of a city government that was spending more than it had.
Matt Rainey for The New York Times
Police officers entering the 5th Precinct station house in Newark on Wednesday, when one officer, Kelvin Barnett, turned in his gun and badge.
“It’s bad,” Mr. Tabera said Wednesday as he stocked shelves, adding, “A lot of police is a good thing.”
A day after Mayor Cory A. Booker announced that the city was laying off roughly 13 percent of its police force, residents battered by decades of runaway crime and stampeding blight raised the specter of the bad old days.
For some that went back as far as the 1970s, when residents abandoned Newark in droves. That was before Mr. Booker, who was elected in 2006, promised to focus on bringing the city’s crime rate down, an effort he pursued with early success: the murder rate fell for two years in a row, and one calendar month last spring there was not a single killing, something that had not happened since the 1960s.
But there has been a rise in crime rates this year, and in the neighborhoods surrounding the grocery store where Mr. Tabera stocked shelves on Wednesday afternoon, the murder rate has nearly doubled since last year.
On Wednesday, as officers continued to turn in their badges and guns at police stations and the Guardian Angels offered to help patrol the streets, citizens, police officers and politicians wrestled with the consequences of a depleted police force.
Mr. Booker acknowledged the perception problem caused by the layoffs, but said that any comparison to the past was unfounded. The city spent years streamlining and modernizing the department, he said, an effort that helped reduce the rate of shootings. “It was a very bad week — there’s no doubt about it,” Mr. Booker said. “This is not something anyone could choose, but it’s not going to stop our momentum.”
Newark’s police director, Garry F. McCarthy, said by consolidating or reorganizing departments the city would be able to keep enough officers on the streets. But some of the cuts were more painful: last month, anticipating the layoffs, the department suspended Operation Impact, a program that deploys officers in high-crime areas.
“It’s disappointing,” Mr. McCarthy said. “It was totally avoidable.”
The layoffs came after Mr. Booker, trying to close an $83 million budget shortfall, was unable to wrest nearly $10 million in concessions from Newark’s largest police union, the Fraternal Order of Police.
During a protracted dispute, the union accused the city of negotiating in bad faith, while Mr. Booker said the union rejected even modest concessions. The union president, Derrick Hatcher, did not return calls seeking comment.
Cities across New Jersey have resorted to similar layoffs, their hands forced by falling tax collections, cuts in state aid and rising expenses. On Tuesday, the State Civil Service Commission approved Camden’s plan to lay off 383 of the city’s 1,100 employees, the deepest cuts in any major municipality. One-third of the Fire Department jobs would be eliminated, along with about half of the police force, which had been spared in previous cuts. All nonuniform city employees are already on unpaid furlough one day a week.
Camden’s layoffs would take effect Jan. 18, and city officials say there is still time to reduce the number if the unions will agree to concessions, but so far the unions have refused.
Trenton has sent layoff notices to about 400 city workers, and Atlantic City has laid off 60 police officers.
The layoffs in Newark represented the deepest cuts to the Police Department in decades. The number of layoffs cited by the city did not include four officers who had passed the civil service exam but had not been hired, Mr. Booker said, adding that he hoped to rehire the officers. One veteran police officer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak for the department, said belt-tightening and reorganization was already causing hardship in Newark’s police districts.
He said the number of detectives in one high-crime district had been cut in half, leaving the remaining detectives overburdened and falling behind on their caseloads. “Without detectives, you’re not solving crimes. You got guys out on patrol responding and no one to back them up. The quality of investigations is not going to be there.”
The Police Department acknowledged what they said were temporary staffing shortages, but said that the headcount in individual police districts would be maintained.
That did nothing to soothe nerves on the streets of Newark on Wednesday — or calm the anger at the political establishment. At lunchtime at Je’s Restaurant in downtown Newark, Kimble Wright, 42, a teacher, said the layoffs were caused by a city government spending beyond its means. “We have enjoyed a lifestyle that cannot be maintained,” he said. “I think we’re coming back to the fundamentals, when block associations used to do the jobs that we hired police to do.”
Angel Williams, 32, who sat nearby and works in child care, said she feared a return to the lawlessness of the 1970s. “I think it’s going to get really bad without more cops,” she said. “If they take them away, who’s going to protect us?”
In the morning’s pouring rain, Kelvin Barnett, 26, who joined the Police Department in 2008, left a precinct stationhouse after turning in his gun and badge. He had been on vacation when news of the layoffs — including his — came. He filed for unemployment on Tuesday.
Mr. Barnett, born and raised in Newark, said he had loved being a police officer and still hoped to find work in his city or another one. He said he and his out-of-work colleagues were worried about being civilians again and living among men they had arrested. And while he was disappointed at the layoffs, he refused to point fingers at either the city or the union.
“I guess people didn’t try hard enough,” he said. “It feels like cutting public safety should be the last resort.”

Richard Pérez-Peña, Matt Rainey and Nate Schweber contributed reporting.