Showing posts with label Oil Spill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oil Spill. Show all posts

Monday, September 13, 2010

BP Spill Oil 'Not Gone, It's Where Nobody Has Looked'

BP Spill Oil 'Not Gone, It's Where Nobody Has Looked'

Researcher says all 13 core samples are showing oil from the spill.
Oil from the BP spill has not been completely cleared, but miles of it is sitting at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, according to a study currently under way.
Professor Samantha Joye of the Department of Marine Sciences at the University of Georgia, who is conducting a study on a research vessel just two miles from the spill zone, said the oil has not disappeared, but is on the sea floor in a layer of scum.
"We're finding it everywhere that we've looked. The oil is not gone," Joye said. "It's in places where nobody has looked for it."
All 13 of the core samples Joye and her UGA team have collected from the bottom of the gulf are showing oil from the spill, she said.
In an interview with ABC News from her vessel, Joye said the oil cannot be natural seepage into the gulf, because the cores they've tested are showing oil only at the top. With natural seepage, the oil would spread from the top to the bottom of the core, she said.
"It looks like you just took a strip of very sticky material and just passed it through the water column and all the stuff from the water column got stuck to it, and got transported to the bottom," Joye said. "I know what a natural seep looks like -- this is not natural seepage."
In some areas the oily material that Joye describes is more than two inches thick. Her team found the material as far as 70 miles away from BP's well.
"If we're seeing two and half inches of oil 16 miles away, God knows what we'll see close in -- I really can't even guess other than to say it's going to be a whole lot more than two and a half inches," Joye said.
This oil remaining underwater has large implications for the state of sea life at the bottom of the gulf.
Joye said she spent hours studying the core samples and was unable to find anything other than bacteria and microorganisms living within.
"There is nothing living in these cores other than bacteria," she said. "I've yet to see a living shrimp, a living worm, nothing."
Studies conducted by the University of Georgia and the University of South Florida caused controversy back in August when they found that almost 80 percent of the oil that leaked from BP's well is still out in the waters of the Gulf.
Their report stood in stark contrast to that of the federal government, which on Aug. 4 declared that 74 percent of the oil was gone, having broken down or been cleaned up.
"A report out today by our scientists shows that the vast majority of the spilled oil has been dispersed or removed from the water," President Obama said in August.
The studies by Joye and other scientists found that what the government had reported to the public only meant that the oil still lurked, invisible in the water.
Though initially denying the claim, BP -- and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration -- acknowledged the existence of the dispersed oil. BP subsequently pledged $500 million for gulf research.
In May, Joye was featured on a newscast as part a team of scientists that discovered giant underwater plumes of oil. Joye and other marine researchers claimed that these plumes present a major threat to underwater creatures.
"The concentrations that are currently out there in various locations are high enough to have a toxic effect on marine life," said Charles Hopkinson, also of the University of Georgia's marine sciences program.
NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco, the government's top ocean scientist, has acknowledged concerns over the effects of dissolved oil, but has said that chemical dispersants had largely done their job.
"Nobody should be surprised," Joye said. "When you apply large scale dispersants, it goes to the bottom -- it sediments out. It gets sticky."
ABC News' Susan Schwartz contributed to this report.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Kevin Costner sells 32 oil spill machines to BP

Kevin Costner sells 32 oil spill machines to BP to recycle 6 million gallons of water a day (photos)

June 10, 10:48 AM · Marci Stone - Salt Lake City Headlines Examiner
Wednesday, Kevin Costner presented his oil spill solution to Congress and demonstrated his machine that recycles and separates oil from water with a 99.9% success rate. Actor, Kevin Costner said that he was inspired by the Exxon-Valdez oil spill in 1989 to come up with an idea that would safely separate oil from water, and over the years he has spent over $20 million on the machine and the patent for it.
“There's been some question as to why I'm here,” Costner told the House Energy and Environment subcommittee on Wednesday. “I want to assure everyone here it's not because I heard a voice in a cornfield,” Costner said joking about the Field of Dreams movie he made several years ago.
Costner said that over the years he has had a difficult time getting any interest in buying the machines. He said he performed for the Coast Guard, private companies, and the government, but no was interested.
“My enthusiasm for the machine was met with apathy,” said Costner.
But in May, BP asked for 6 of Costner’s machines to be flown to the Gulf to be tested. And now BP has ordered 32 of the machines because they have an almost 100% success rate in separating oil from ocean water. The machines, marketed by Ocean Therapy Solutions take in the oily water and recycle the water. 32 machines will process about 6 million gallons of water each day.
Costner said “that as long as the oil industry profits from the sea, they have an obligation to protect it.”  He went on to say that the cleaning devices “should be on every ship transporting oil, they should be on every derrick, they should be in every harbor.”
“There's 33 platforms that are shut down,” said Costner. “We can put Americans back to work and bring into the 21st century the technology of oil spill recovery.”
To see a video of how the device works, click here.

Last Friday, Obama cancelled his business trip to Asia and headed back down to the Gulf Coast. Thursday night, Obama told Larry King that he was "furious with the entire situation." For more on that story, click here.

To see incredible photos of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, click here.

To see photos taken recently of the oil spill that hit the Louisiana coastline and the wildlife it has affected, click here.

Recently, a new video of the gushing oil had many of the investigative teams calling BP untrustworthy because more oil was leaking from the well then they originally claimed. For more on that story, click here.

The state of Utah has 28 oil drilling companies throughout the state. Two years ago President Bush allowed oil drilling to be done near two national parks, much to the dismay of many Utah residents. According to a ABC News report Wednesday night, oil drilling isn’t considered safe in the US because the government has not ordered the same safety requirements in oil drilling that other countries require, and residents near the oil drilling are typically distraught.

If you liked this article, please click on the subscribe button above to receive an email when new articles are published by this examiner.

Source: Houston Chronicle

Joran van der Sloot says he killed Flores because she researched Natalee Holloway’s death (photos)

Photos: Manny Pacquiao cancels visit with controversial U.S. Senator Harry Reid

Recent articles from this examiner:
DHL sets up warehouse for disaster relief in Guatemala City, after thousands turned away (photos)
Shocking Gary Coleman death photos printed by Globe magazine, with It Was Murder headline
YouthCity Artways program is eliminated by Salt Lake City Council
Tents, food and basic necessities sent to Guatemala to help tropical storm victims (photos) 
Gary Coleman leaves sad funeral instructions; Shannon Price takes items from house (photos)
Gary Coleman’s will filed in Utah court; Coleman wanted to be cremated (photos)
Kevin Costner to testify on his machines that recycle oil spilled water to help in the Gulf
Utah has the highest gas prices in the continental US
Oil rig survivors speak out about shortcut taken before rig explosion; safety issues raised (video)
Guatemala is shattered after tropical storm; food shortages and homeless are rampant (video, photos)
Shannon Price planned to remarry Gary Coleman, and she’s made claims to his estate
Shannon Price has a part in selling Gary Coleman death photos; photos sold today to tabloid
Oil spill containment cap is working and oil being collected is climbing steadily (photos)

Kevin Costner talks with Dr. Nancy Kinner, from 
the Costal Response Research Center on Wednesday
Kevin Costner talks with Dr. Nancy Kinner, from the Costal Response Research Center on Wednesday
Associated Press

Florida wants escrow funds as heavier oil washes in

Florida wants escrow funds as heavier oil washes in

PENSACOLA BEACH
Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:24pm EDT
Patches of oil from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill blanket a 
beach in Pensacola Beach, Florida June 4, 2010. REUTERS/Lee Celano
PENSACOLA BEACH Florida (Reuters) - Florida demanded on Thursday that BP Plc put $2.5 billion in escrow to cover potential losses from the Gulf of Mexico spill, as heavier concentrations of oil begun sloshing up on its shores.
Tar balls and crude oil "mousse" entered Perdido Bay in northwest Florida, near the tourist haven of Pensacola, late on Wednesday, prompting state and local officials to step up skimming operations before it tainted spawning areas.
Red snapper, grouper and speckled trout are among the fish that spawn there. Neighboring Alabama's primary oyster beds also are in the same area.
Mike Sole, secretary of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, said the heavier concentrations should continue to arrive on northwest Florida shores over the next several days.
"We're going to continue to see this type of impact for the next 72 hours," Sole said. "We really need to keep our attention on this."
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum sent a letter to BP demanding that it put at least $2.5 billion into a dedicated escrow account to cover spill-related losses to the state and its residents.
McCollum, in a close race for the Republican gubernatorial nomination, said the account was essential as Florida braced for what would likely be a "staggering blow" to its economy, with a significant impact on workers and government revenues.
The $2.5 billion is based on an economist's estimate of potential losses in 23 Gulf Coast counties in tourism-dependent Florida.
CLEAN-UP HAMPERED
The spill, which began when an offshore rig exploded on April 20, killing 11 workers, has cost BP $1.43 billion so far, according to the company's estimates.
The consistency of the oil washing ashore in northwest Florida, a cross between tar balls and fresh crude, has made collection difficult. Oil absorbing booms have been ineffective and skimmers have struggled to pick up the debris in an inland waterway shared by Florida and Alabama, local officials said.
Spill clean-up and containment efforts have been hampered by breakdowns in communication between local monitors, state officials and representatives of the Unified Command Center -- grouping BP and Transocean Ltd. with federal agencies -- in Mobile, Alabama, officials said.
"We need to figure out how to be proactive and not just react to reports," Sole said.
Debris from the spill reached the Panhandle region of northwest Florida late last week. But until Wednesday it had been limited to relatively small tar balls, washing up on some white-sand beaches.
State meteorologist Amy Godsey said a prevailing Gulf of Mexico current known as "The Loop" has begun to reattach itself to a more northerly "Loop Ring" that has kept the bulk of spilled oil from working its way into the Straits of Florida.
Oceanographers say it now seems likely that oil from the spill will enter the Straits. If that occurred, oil would be carried by the Gulf Stream along Florida's heavily populated Atlantic coast and then further up the U.S. eastern seaboard, they say.

Corporations Won't Self-Regulate - Barbara Streisand

Barbra Streisand

Barbra Streisand

Posted: June 9, 2010 03:23 PM

Corporations Won't Self-Regulate


It's now well over a month since the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded off the Gulf of Mexico and created the largest man-made environmental catastrophe in American history. The question haunting everyone is: how was this allowed to happen? From the devastated fishermen and business owners in the Gulf Coast to environmental activists across the country -- we all have been watching, horrified, as millions of gallons of oil continue to pour into the ocean, destroying people's livelihoods, poisoning marine life and destroying coastlines and eco-systems for decades to come.
In the wake of this disaster, I have no doubt that the spill occurred because the pendulum of power in our country has swung dangerously far in favor of corporations. The systematized deregulation of our industries, which began under President Reagan and continued vigorously under George W. Bush, is now literally destroying our environment.
For eight years, Bush and Cheney were both far too cozy with corporate America, and were deeply committed to deregulating industry from the government's oversight. Bush and Cheney moved people from big industry into government positions, placing them in charge of both writing the rules and policing the very industries they once worked for. Whether in financial meltdowns or oil spills, we are reaping the consequences of these actions and will continue to do so for years to come. Now, the recent Supreme Court decision in Citizen's United allows corporations to spend unlimited amounts of money on federal elections, thereby giving the biggest industries unprecedented influence in our democracy (that's why we need a progressive on the Court).
Over the last six weeks, the perpetrator of the Gulf Coast spill, British Petroleum, has been playing the blame game, stating that Transocean, the owner of the oil rig, is at fault and that Halliburton's poor job cementing the base of the well contributed to the spill. Each day we uncover more information on how these private companies, concerned only with their bottom line, have cut corners and neglected maintenance in a race toward higher profits (for instance, BP decided NOT to purchase a $500,000 blowout preventer valve, which gets bolted onto the sea floor at the wellhead as a failsafe to prevent these types of disasters). Many other countries require that oil companies purchase blowout preventers to protect against accidents and do not allow individual regulators to make these decisions. In addition, in other countries, regulations require oil companies doing deep water drilling to build and maintain a relief well from the outset to alleviate the affects of possible spills.
The BP spill also brought to light the corruption and ineptitude in the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service office. President Obama inherited most of this staff since many of the employees were placed into these regulatory roles during the eight years that Bush was President. Many of the regulators were already friends with industry officials and some had worked in the oil and gas business before their stint in government. These regulators apparently let the oil and gas companies fill out their own inspection forms in pencil and then traced over their writing in ink. In return for their leniency, regulators accepted invitations to hunting trips and tickets to college football games courtesy of the oil and gas companies. Basically, Bush put the foxes in charge of guarding the hen house! In addition, the Minerals Management Service frequently granted waivers to BP and other oil companies releasing them from providing regulators detailed environmental impact and safety contingency statements regarding the areas they planned to drill for oil. These waivers allowed oil companies to take short cuts, which ultimately lead to the kind of disaster we are now experiencing in the Gulf.
Lack of accountability, lack of oversight, lack of regulation, corruption...this all sounds frighteningly familiar. Although many had hoped we had learned our lesson after the recent financial meltdown, this disaster has further proved that free market capitalism can only be trustworthy and accountable if industries are properly regulated. Bush allowed polluters to self- regulate. We can't assume that companies like BP and Halliburton will spend the time and money to ensure environmental safety, just like we have learned the hard way that financial institutions like Lehman Brothers and Bear Sterns will not safeguard our life savings. Sadly, we now know that when companies driven by profit are not regulated, they will not prioritize the public's best interest.
We have heard people say over and over again that less government is good government. During the health care debate, people wanted government to "stay out of their Medicare," not realizing that Medicare is a government program. Without government regulations and a trustworthy system of checks and balances, this will not be the last oil spill that could have been prevented...or the last financial meltdown. There's little the federal government can do now to save the birds, beaches and marshes steeped in oil along the Gulf, but as we move forward, we can demand that our government move quickly to put strong, sound regulations in place across all sectors in order to protect our people and our country.

Palin's Phony "Call Me!" Offer

Shannyn Moore

Shannyn Moore

Posted: June 9, 2010 11:30 AM









Palin's Phony "Call Me!" Offer


Sarah has a new blog entry.
You'll need a pair of chest waders and a barf bag to get through it.
Blasting the president for not taking control of a free-market corporation reveals frayed tea bag credentials:
These decisions and the resulting spill have shaken the public's confidence in the ability to safely drill. Unless government appropriately regulates oil developments and holds oil executives accountable, the public will not trust them to drill, baby, drill. And we must! Or we will be even more beholden to, and controlled by, dangerous foreign regimes that supply much of our energy.
Foreign regimes like Canada and Mexico who deliver more oil to America than any other country? The best way to enter this country from North or South would be in an oil barrel. She goes on:

As the aforementioned article notes, BP's operation in Alaska would hurt our state and waste public resources if allowed to continue. That's why my administration created the Petroleum Systems Integrity Office (PSIO) when we saw proof of improper maintenance of oil infrastructure in our state. We had to verify. And that's why we instituted new oversight and held BP and other oil companies financially accountable for poor maintenance practices. We knew we could partner with them to develop resources without pussyfooting around with them. As a CEO, it was my job to look out for the interests of Alaskans with the same intensity and action as the oil company CEOs looked out for the interests of their shareholders.

In March of 2006, Alaska had the largest onshore spill in Alaska history (210,000 gallons) went undetected for at least five days. Three BP gas and oil pipelines on Alaska's North Slope clogged or ruptured between September 2008 and November 2009. All while Palin was preoccupied with shopping, campaigning, race baiting and getting a book deal. Todd Palin worked for BP for 18 years. BP had another spill in December 2009 when a pipeline, while being inspected, broke from its well housing. Six acres of Alaskan tundra was contaminated. The DOJ began an investigation. The Alaska Attorney General, Talis Colberg, was too busy advising Todd Palin and other Palin aids to ignore subpoenas to notice. Just last month, the pipeline was closed down due to a spill that cost the state tens of millions of dollars.
BTW, you weren't a CEO, you were a governor. Elected not hired. Quit not fired.
I learned firsthand the way these companies operate when I served as chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC). I ended up resigning in protest because my bosses (the Governor and his chief of staff at the time) wouldn't support efforts to clean up the corruption involving improper conflicts of interest with energy companies that the state was supposed to be watching. (I wrote about this valuable learning experience in my book, "Going Rogue".) I felt guilty taking home a big paycheck while being reduced to sitting on my thumbs - essentially rendered ineffective as a supervisor of a regulatory agency in charge of nearly 20% of the U.S. domestic supply of energy.
The reason Palin really quit was complicated. Corrupt? Oh, beyond belief. Palin hacking into a co-workers email account? Well, priceless. It got a bit uncomfortable around there. I never noticed Palin unwilling to take money for nothing. Paid for sleeping in her own bed, flying her kids around, clothes, etc. Good to see she's gotten over that.
My experience (though, granted, I got the message loud and clear during the campaign that my executive experience managing the fastest growing community in the state, and then running the largest state in the union, was nothing compared to the experiences of a community organizer) showed me how government officials and oil execs could scratch each others' backs to the detriment of the public, and it made me ill. I ran for Governor to fight such practices. So, as a former chief executive, I humbly offer this advice to the President: you must verify. That means you must meet with Hayward. Demand answers.
Considering the cozy relationship between Palin and Dick Cheney, I don't want to think about back scratching. Sarah's "executive experience" in her own hometown? She left it in massive debt-still losing the battle with meth. The largest state? That's geography. Consider the "largest state in the union" didn't give one red cent to SarahPAC in the first quarter of this year. We demanded answers. She quit.
In the interview today, the President said "I don't sit around just talking to experts because this is a college seminar. We talk to these folks because they potentially have the best answers, so I know whose ass to kick."
Please, sir, for the sake of the Gulf residents, reach out to experts who have experience holding oil companies accountable. I suggested a few weeks ago that you start with Alaska's Department of Natural Resources, led by Commissioner Tom Irwin. Having worked with Tom and his DNR and AGIA team led by Marty Rutherford, I can vouch for their integrity and expertise in dealing with Big Oil and overseeing its developments.
One of the best things Palin did was hire Irwin and Rutherford. She didn't put Pat Galvin on the list, but should have. I'll vouch for them. See, they're still working for Alaskans. Palin also failed to mention Rick Steiner and Riki Ott who have been invaluable to those suffering in the Gulf. Steiner had his funding pulled by the University of Alaska last year-the same week they cut the red ribbon on the new UAA Conoco Phillips "Science" Building.
We've all lived and worked through the Exxon-Valdez spill. They can help you. Give them a call. Or, what the heck, give me a call.
No. I lived and worked through the Spill. I smelled it every day, ruined more boots than I can count and if tears could clean crude off a baby otter, I would have saved every one of them. When Katie Couric asked what SCOTUS decision other than Roe v Wade weren't to Palin's liking, she COULDN'T REMEMBER the Exxon v Baker decision 3 months earlier!
If President Obama wants to look North for advice, I'd point him to the late Wally Hickel's book Who Owns America? Hickel was Nixon's Secretary of the Interior at the time of the Santa Barbara Spill in 1970. He pulled their leases for wasting a publicly owned resource. He dusted off the 1899 Refuse act for "teeth" to fight water polluting companies.
Hickel wrote: "That was law enough. All that was lacking was guys with guts. The laws are there. What is needed is the men--men with attitude."
Wally knew how to kick ass after an oil spill. His fighting spirit and can-do attitude are missed now more than ever.

Sarah Palin Demands Hardball Regulations and a Takeover of BP

Bob Cesca

Posted: June 9, 2010 06:22 PM

On her Facebook page this week, Sarah Palin outlined a pretty solid case for tough government regulations against corporations. (By the way, none of the sentences ended with the word "also," nor did the entry read like a really bad local newspaper letter to the editor, so I assume it was ghost-written.)
Yes, seriously. Sarah Palin is in favor of the federal government planting its gigantic boot on the throats of energy companies. She put it in writing. Not only that but she even proposed that our socialist, anti-capitalist, wealth-redistributing president call her on the phone so she can describe to him specifically how to impose all kinds of big government regulations against BP and others.
It's about damn time.
I knew if we just continued to make the case for serious government regulation of corporations, we'd finally win some minds and hearts -- even minds as airy, and wolf-snipering hearts as hardened as Sarah Palin's.
Here's the centerpiece of what she wrote:
Unless government appropriately regulates oil developments and holds oil executives accountable, the public will not trust them to drill, baby, drill. And we must!
I can only assume she was suggesting that "we must!" regulate and drill. For the record, we're already drilling offshore, so enough of this hackish "drill, baby, drill" screeching. There are already 3,858 oil and gas platforms operating in the Gulf of Mexico alone, according to NOAA. Here's a convenient map with yellow dots indicating all of the locations where we're already, you know, drilling, baby, drilling:
2010-06-09-Gulf_Coast_Platforms.jpg
I understand, however, that most Republicans aren't satisfied and want more drilling. They want the moratorium on new deepwater drilling permits to end, and they want new exploration for oil in heretofore untapped leases all along the entire coast of the United States. The problem is that it would take around 10 years to get platforms online and producing in the areas where there are untapped leases, and the deepwater platforms that are ready to drill now don't have the failsafe mechanisms -- and the regulations Sarah wants -- in place yet. So how about this compromise: we continue to drill with the existing offshore wells, but, as Sarah Palin suggests, we regulate the hell out of them? Once those regulations are in place, maybe we can talk about new offshore leases rather than drilling willy-nilly.
But that doesn't appear good enough for Sarah Palin's southern allies.
Rand Paul, who Sarah endorsed, doesn't want any regulation whatsoever.
Bobby Jindal, when he's not hyperventilating into a bag or begging for taxpayer wealth to be redistributed from elsewhere to Louisiana, is demanding that new deepwater oil platforms be allowed to immediately begin pumping before new regulations are put in place.
Haley Barbour, the real life Boss Hogg and one of the only Republicans who successfully makes Sarah Palin look like a genius, said the other day that the oil is just like "food mousse" and that it's non-toxic. Food mousse! Governor Barbour should probably call Sarah Palin so she can explain how the president desperately needs to take over the clean-up of all that mousse. Then again, Sarah would probably advise that Barbour shoot the "moose." Confusion over the difference between "mousse" and "moose" ensues.
Just about every Gulf coast politician, including Barbour, Jindal and both Republicans and Democrats alike, is desperate for the president to lift his moratorium on new deepwater drilling permits.
Their favorite line: we didn't stop running the space shuttle missions after the Challenger disaster, so why should we stop drilling in deep water? Well, in reality, we stopped running space shuttle missions for 32 months following the explosion. And the Challenger explosion didn't poison thousands of square miles of natural resources while potentially killing the entire coastal fishing industry from Louisiana to the Florida panhandle -- and potentially beyond.
Hell, Rep. Don Young, a Republican from Sarah Palin's home state of Alaska doesn't even think the largest environmental disaster in American history is a disaster at all.
"This is not an environmental disaster," Rep. Young said, "and I will say that again and again because it is a natural phenomenon." Call Sarah, Rep. Young. She'll explain it.
Can we also infer that Sarah Palin supports the Canadian regulation mandating a relief well for every offshore oil platform? If BP and Transocean had drilled a $100 million relief well to accompany the Deepwater Horizon platform, the bulk of the gusher would've been mitigated before it really began.
Will you, Sarah Palin, endorse a new federal regulation mandating relief wells for every offshore oil well? And if not, why not? You're demanding all kinds of new regulations, why not this one? Additionally, will you condemn BP for lobbying the Canadian government to repeal its relief well mandate?
Meanwhile, Sarah Palin's Republican friends in Congress spent much of the last 40 days filibustering a law that would lift the liability cap on oil companies. Does she support Senator Inhofe and others who blocked this legislation while tens of thousands of barrels of oil spewed from BP's blowout preventer and riser?
Sarah wrote that she supports "playing hardball with Big Oil" and praised her former "administration's efforts in holding Big Oil accountable to operate ethically and responsibly." So let's hear it then. I want to know specifically what Sarah Palin supports in terms of new regulations.
In her Facebook entry, she demanded:
Mr. President: with all due respect, you have to get involved, sir. The priorities and timeline of an oil company are not the same as the public's. You cannot outsource the cleanup and the responsibility and the trust to BP and expect that the legitimate interests of Americans adversely affected by this spill will somehow be met.
In this paragraph, she makes it abundantly clear that she supports government intervention in the free market. Specifically, she endorsed the idea of the president taking over the entire operation. In order to achieve this, the president would either have to nationalize BP or instruct the government to put BP into temporary receivership. A government takeover. But when the rest of us were enumerating the tens of thousands of annual deaths due to a lack of health insurance, Sarah Palin was one of the most vocal opponents of the president "taking over" the health care industry (in reality, he really wasn't proposing any such thing). When General Motors and Chrysler were falling apart, she opposed the president "taking over" those companies (he really didn't, and both companies have paid back their loans).
In this crisis, she literally wants the president to "call her" so she can explain to him exactly how he ought to be taking over the situation and, concurrently, implementing new "hardball" regulations. She also is suggesting "holding executives accountable" for their mistakes. Does she feel the same about WellPoint? Or Goldman-Sachs? How about Monsanto? Or Halliburton? Halliburton was the corporation that botched the cement job on the well. Actually, this isn't the first time Halliburton has screwed up the Deepwater Horizon rig. In November of 2005...
...the Deepwater Horizon was positioned above another well in the Gulf, faulty cement work allowed wall-supporting steel casing to come apart. Almost 15,000 gallons of drilling fluid spilled into the Gulf.
Maybe Liz Cheney should "call" Sarah. This way, Sarah can explain how Halliburton executives should be "held accountable" and why new government regulations ought to be imposed -- say nothing of perhaps the president taking over its operations, rather than "outsourcing" it. While they're both on the phone, Sarah can explain to Liz Cheney how Halliburton has repeatedly defrauded the American taxpayer and jeopardized American soldiers.
But she won't.
Because I don't believe Sarah Palin is really in favor of any of this. Sarah Palin only really supports the opposite of whatever she perceives to be the position of the president. This is the basis for the entire modern post-Bush Republican-slash-tea party movement. Do the opposite. Push for the opposite. There's no concern for consistency or hypocrisy. The platform is very simply: we believe the opposite of anything the president, the Democrats and the progressives say, regardless of whether it's contradictory, crazy or stupid.
Hopefully I'm wrong, and Sarah Palin will begin to use her reality-show celebrity to help us roll back this 40 year deregulatory trend in government by stripping corporations of the carte blanche they've enjoyed for too long.
If you're really interested in helping, Sarah, call me.
Bob Cesca's Awesome Blog
Listen to the Bob & Elvis Show

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Deep-sea ice crystals stymie Gulf oil leak fix

Deep-sea ice crystals stymie Gulf oil leak fix

Published - May 08 2010 09:02PM EST
By HARRY R. WEBER and SARAH LARIMER - Associated Press Writers

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO— A novel but risky attempt to use a 100-ton steel-and-concrete box to cover a deepwater oil well gushing toxic crude into the Gulf of Mexico was aborted Saturday after ice crystals encased it, an ominous development as thick blobs of tar began washing up on Alabama's white sand beaches.
The setback left the mission to cap the ruptured well in doubt. It had taken about two weeks to build the box and three days to cart it 50 miles out then slowly lower it to the well a mile below the surface, but the frozen depths were too much for it to handle.
Still, BP officials overseeing the cleanup efforts were not giving up just yet on hopes that a containment box _ either the one brought there or a larger one being built _ could cover the well and be used to capture the oil and funnel it to a tanker at the surface to be carted away. Officials said it would be at least Monday before a decision was made on what next step to take.
"I wouldn't say it's failed yet," BP chief operating officer Doug Suttles said. "What I would say is what we attempted to do ... didn't work."
There was a renewed sense of urgency as dime- to golfball-sized balls of tar began washing up on Dauphin Island, three miles off the Alabama mainland at the mouth of Mobile Bay and much farther east than the thin, rainbow sheens that had so far arrived sporadically in the Louisiana marshes.
"It almost looks like bark, but when you pick it up it definitely has a liquid consistency and it's definitely oil," said Kimberly Creel, 41, who was hanging out and swimming with hundreds of other beachgoers. "... I can only imagine what might be coming this way that might be larger."
About a half dozen tar balls had been collected by Saturday afternoon at Dauphin Island, Coast Guard chief warrant officer Adam Wine said in Mobile. Authorities planned to test the substance but strongly suspected it came from the oil spill.
A long line of materials that resembled a string of pompoms were positioned on a stretch of the shore. Crews walked along the beach in rubber boots, carrying trash bags to clear debris from the sand.
Brenda Prosser, of Mobile, said she wept when she saw the workers.
"I just started crying. I couldn't quit crying. I'm shaking now," Prosser said. "To know that our beach may be black or brown, or that we can't get in the water, it's so sad."
Prosser, 46, said she was afraid to let her 9-year-old son, Grant, get in the water, and she worried that the spill would rob her of precious moments with her own child.
"I've been coming here since I was my son's age, as far back as I can remember in my life," Prosser said.
In the three weeks since the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded on April 20, killing 11 workers, about 210,000 gallons of crude a day has been flowing into the Gulf. Until Saturday none of the thick sludge _ those iconic images of past spills _ had reached Gulf shores.
It was a troubling turn of events, especially since the intrepid efforts to use the containment box had not yet succeeded. There has been a rabid fascination with the effort to use the peaked box the size of a four-story house to place over the ruptured well. It had taken more than 12 hours to slowly lower it to the seafloor, a task that required painstaking precision to accurately position it over the well or it could damage the leaking pipe and make the problem worse.
It was fraught with doubt and peril since nothing like it had been attempted at such depths with water pressure great enough to crush a submarine. It ended up encountering an icy crystals, familiar territory for deepwater drilling.
The icy buildup on the containment box made it too buoyant and clogged it up, BP's Suttles said. Workers who had carefully lowered the massive box over the leak nearly a mile below the surface had to lift it and move it some 600 feet to the side. If it had worked, authorities had said it would reduce the flow by about 85 percent, buying a bit more time as a three-month effort to drill a relief well goes on simultaneously.
Company and Coast Guard officials had cautioned that icelike hydrates, a slushy mixture of gas and water, would be one of the biggest challenges to the containment box plan, and their warnings proved accurate. The crystals clogged the opening in the top of the peaked box like sand in a funnel, only upside-down.
Options under consideration included raising the box high enough that warmer water would prevent the slush from forming, or using heated water or methanol to prevent the crystals from forming.
Steve Rinehart, a BP spokesman in Mobile, Ala., said late Saturday a second containment device was under construction by Wild Well Control, Inc., in Port Fourchon, La., the company that built the first one.
"It's the same general idea and approach. It may be a slightly different size and shape," he said.
Even as officials pondered their next move, Coast Guard Rear Adm. Mary Landry said she must continue to manage expectations of what the containment box can do.
"This dome is no silver bullet to stop the leak," she said.
The captain of the supply boat that carried the precious cargo for 11 hours from the Louisiana coast earlier last week wasn't giving up hope.
"Everybody knew this was a possibility well before we brought the dome out," Capt. Demi Shaffer, of Seward, Alaska, told an Associated Press reporter stationed in the Gulf in the heart of the containment zone with the 12-man crew of the Joe Griffin. "It's an everyday occurrence when you're drilling, with the pipeline trying to freeze up."
The spot where Deepwater Horizon rig once was positioned is now teeming with vessels working on containing the well. There are 15 boats and large ships at or near the site _ some being used in an ongoing effort to drill a relief well, another with the crane that lowered the containment device to the seafloor.
There is even a vessel at the site called the Seacor Lee that is sending a live video feed from the undersea robots back to BP's operations center in Houston.
"Everyone was hoping that that would slow it down a bit if not stop it," said Shane Robichaux, of Chauvin, a 39-year-old registered nurse relaxing at his vacation camp in Cocodrie, La. "I'm sure they'll keep working on it `til it gets fixed, one way or another. But we were hopeful that would shut it down."
The original blowout was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expanding quickly as it burst through several seals and barriers before exploding, according to interviews with rig workers conducted during BP PLC's internal investigation.
Deep beneath the seafloor, methane is in a slushy, crystalline form. Deep sea oil drillers often encounter pockets of methane crystals as they dig into the earth.
As the bubble rose up the drill column from the high-pressure environs of the deep to the less pressurized shallows, it intensified and grew, breaking through various safety barriers, said Robert Bea, a University of California Berkley engineering professor and oil pipeline expert who detailed the interviews to an Associated Press reporter.
"A small bubble becomes a really big bubble," Bea said. "So the expanding bubble becomes like a cannon shooting the gas into your face."

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Lawyers flock to Gulf Coast for oil spill lawsuit

Lawyers flock to Gulf Coast for oil spill lawsuits
By CURT ANDERSON and THOMAS WATKINS, Associated Press Writers Curt Anderson And Thomas Watkins, Associated Press Writers Sat May 1, 1:37 pm ET

MIAMI – Teams of lawyers from around the nation are mobilizing for a gargantuan legal battle over the massive Gulf Coast oil spill, filing multiple lawsuits in recent days that together could dwarf the half-billion dollars awarded in the Exxon Valdez disaster two decades ago.

If the oil slick fouls popular beaches, ruins fisheries and disrupts traffic on the Mississippi River, attorneys say there could be hundreds of thousands of plaintiffs from Texas to Florida seeking monetary damages from oil producer BP PLC and other companies that ran the Transocean Deepwater Horizon drilling rig.

At least 26 federal lawsuits have been filed since the spill by commercial fishermen, charter boat captains, resort management companies and individual property owners in Louisiana, Florida, Alabama and Mississippi. Many of the suits claim the disaster was caused when workers for oil services contractor Halliburton Inc. improperly capped a well — a process known as cementing. Halliburton denied that. Investigators are still looking into the cause.

Capt. Mike "Sandbar" Salley, who runs Sure Shot Charters out of Orange Beach, Ala., is one of many fishermen watching helplessly as customers cancel fishing excursions at the start of a busy summer season, in which he makes 80 percent of his income. Salley, 51, is a plaintiff in one of the potential class-action lawsuits seeking to recover damages from the operators of the sunken oil rig.

"It's somebody's fault and somebody needs to answer for it," said Salley, who added that his phone and those of other boat captains have been ringing nonstop with lawyers seeking oil-spill clients. "This is going to shut down the entire coast."

Toxic residues remain to this day after the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska's Prince William Sound, studies have shown. Thousands of fishermen, cannery workers, landowners and Native Americans were initially awarded $5 billion in punitive damages. That was reduced on appeal to $2.5 billion and then, in 2008, cut down to $507.5 million by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Even though the Supreme Court reduced the size of damages, attorneys said the Gulf Coast cases have the potential to be much bigger considering the large coastal population and diverse economy that includes tourism, fishing and shipping industries.

Most of the lawsuits filed so far are potential class-action cases, meaning the plaintiffs seek to represent an entire group of people in similar situations who claim to have suffered economic losses due to company negligence.

Louisiana attorney Daniel Becnel is leading one group of lawyers suing BP, rig owner Transocean Ltd. and companies that had roles in rig operations, such as Cameron International, which produced the rig's blowout preventers.

Becnel said such legal teams are common in large, complex cases because each lawyer brings their own specialties. They also set up committees to screen potential clients and identify the strongest cases.

"I want the best brief writers. I want the best deposition takers. I want the best lawyers who can work with experts," said Becnel, who has also been involved in recent Toyota recall and Chinese drywall lawsuits.

Typically when numerous federal lawsuits make similar allegations in different courts, they are consolidated before a single judge who makes key pretrial decisions, such as whether to certify lawsuits as a class action and whether to allow the case to continue to trial.

The companies named as defendants declined comment on the lawsuits, although Transocean did issue a statement saying its "focus remains on meeting the needs of family members during this difficult time" as well as supporting BP in cleanup efforts. Halliburton said in a statement that it was cooperating with the investigation, adding that it was "premature and irresponsible to speculate" on the possible cause of the explosion.

The cases could also impact Lloyd's of London, Transocean's major insurer.

Family members of the 11 men missing and feared dead are also beginning to file lawsuits, which are governed by a special maritime law known as the Death on the High Seas Act.

Natalie Roshto of Amite County, Miss., wife of missing rig worker Shane Roshto, claimed in her lawsuit filed in Louisiana federal court on April 21 that she is suffering post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety. Initially, her lawsuit seeks payment of $40 a day since the explosion under what are called "maintenance and cure" benefits provide by those laws.

Troy Wetzel, a 45-year-old charter captain in Venice, La., is among those filing a potential class-action case. He ticked off a list of hardships that began with Hurricane Katrina in 2005, continued with Hurricane Gustav in 2008 and is now capped by the oil spill.

Wetzel said his lawsuit isn't aimed at driving the oil industry out of the Gulf Coast.

"We do want oil wells. We love them. It's a giant reef," he said, referring to how fish congregate around rigs. "All we want is for them to clean up their problem before they start drilling any more, and take care of us. If you're going to ruin our environment, you've got to take care of us."

___

Watkins reported from Los Angeles.