How
Sequestration Is Devastating Programs That Aid Senior Citizens
Last week, ThinkProgress spoke to directors of Meals on Wheels
programs across the country, and they detailed how sequestration is cutting meal
delivery and on-site meal services to needy seniors who may now have to go
hungry. Since then, stories about sequestration’s harmful cuts to seniors have
continued to pour in from across the country. The stories from Florida and
Maine have been particularly wrenching:
• Throughout Florida, meal services for seniors have been cut. In
the Orlando area, five senior meal sites are closing, another 20 seniors are losing their
home support services, and other seniors will lose their transportation
services, including help getting to medical appointments. Similarly, Aging
Matters in Brevard had to close two of its lunch sites. In Ocala, Marion
Senior Services will serve 6,000 fewer meals
in 2013. Meanwhile, Holly Hill, Ormand Beach and six other locations from
Deland to New Smyrna Beach had to cut its on-site meals from 5 days a week to 4 days a week
while the waiting list for home-delivered meals is at 2,356 and growing. These
may just be numbers to some, but not to the seniors who depend on the meals.
Sometimes, these meals are seniors’ “only hot meal of the day.”
• The same stories are playing out in Maine. In central Maine,
Spectrum Generations has had to cut its meal delivery service to just once a week, while Eastern
Agency on Aging in Bangor had to furlough its employees once a week. “It is
having a tremendous impact on people who need services…These are services that
help to keep people — the elderly and the disabled — living in their homes and
in their communities rather than living in institutions, which are much more
expensive,” said Jessica Maurer, executive director of the Maine Association of
Area Agencies on Aging. Meanwhile, in midcoast Maine, the Meals on Wheels
program is facing funding shortfalls that may impact its on-site meal
service program.
But losing crucial nutrition support services is not the only way
sequestration is hurting seniors. It is also robbing $75 million from Aging and
Disability Services programs. These include programs that protect vulnerable
adults from elder abuse, that support services for people experiencing
Alzheimer’s disease, and that provide home and community-based services that
allow seniors to live at home for as long as possible. These drastic cuts are
funneled down to the local level in various forms, from funding cuts to senior
centers in Missourito layoffs at a hospice in Kentucky.
In total, sequestration is cutting more than $230 million to
four critical programs that support seniors. It cuts $117 million from Social
Services Block Grants, which fund Meals on Wheels and other important initiatives,
$75 million from Aging and Disability Services programs, $23 million from
Community Service Employment for Older Americans programs, and $19 million from
Housing for Elderly programs. But while Congress rushed to stop flight delays
right before they flew home for recess, they have done nothing to ease the pain
of these cuts on seniors.
We’ve laid out before some revenue options that can help ease
the sequester. Many have been suggested in the president’s budget, including the elimination
of the special tax break for derivatives traders that would yield $2.4 billion
— well more than what is needed to stop sequestration’s harmful impacts on
seniors. Ending subsidies for corporate jet owners and tax breaks for golf
courses would get us halfway there. And so we ask this question again: what, exactly,
are Congress’ priorities?
No comments:
Post a Comment